My Life is Crap
  • Home
  • Experiment.com
  • Blog
  • About the Biologist
    • Flash Mob
  • Research
  • Publications
    • In the News
  • Links
  • Contact Me

Off the List

6/26/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
The eastern cougar, Puma concolor couguar, is officially being removed from the endangered species list.  It is being declared extinct since an eastern cougar has not been seen since 1938. The decision is based on an extensive review by the US Fish and Wildlife Services which included "the best available scientific and historic information [which we now know from my lion research isn't the best scientific and historic information, just the best available of the resources accessible to us lowly wildlife researchers], queried 21 states and eastern Canadian provinces, and reviewed hundreds of reports from the public."  It's not that there haven't been any cougars seen, it's just that they claim that any cougars seen in the east in the past 77 years are a result of dispersing animals from western populations or animals that have been released or escaped from captivity. These claims come from more than 100 reports dating back to 1900. 

Picture
There isn't much genetic research on the puma (FYI: puma, cougar, mountain lion, catamount, panther... all the same thing, just depends on where you are and who you talk to).  The scientific community seems to be quite torn about taxonomic assessment and there has been much debate around subspecies distinction, particularly in the case of using cougars in Texas to repopulate the Florida panther population.  Some say they are distinct enough that they shouldn't be hybridized while others say they are the same so one can successfully repopulate the other.  According to the Federal Register,  "the best available information continues to support the assignment of the eastern taxon to Puma concolor couguar as distinct from other North American subspecies" based primarily on biology and life history. 

The proposal to remove the eastern cougar from the endangered species list does not affect the status of the endangered Florida panther subspecies, a cluster of conservation genetics issues to discuss in more detail at another time.  But, although the extinct animals will no longer be protected under the Endangered Species Act, which is intended to save animals and plants that still have a recorded population, it will also no longer be able to be used to protect similar animals, such as the Florida panther.  Not sure if that matters since the Florida panther is already protected (and possibly diluted with Texas cougar) but its interesting nonetheless. 

0 Comments

Oh the Controversy

10/28/2013

2 Comments

 
National Geographic released an article today about the Dallas Safari Club’s most recent fundraising endeavor and it is pissing a lot of people off.  The controversy arises from what they are offering their patrons to raise funds – the opportunity to hunt an endangered black rhino.  Now, I don’t regularly advocate the hunting of endangered species whose very close relative recently went extinct in the wild, but, Dallas Safari Club’s fundraising strategy is not as ill thought out as all the Facebook comments seem to imply it is.  What these angry people are completely disregarding are two things:
  • The auction prize allows them to hunt specific rhino which are no longer contributing members to the population which, in turn, allows the rhino population to grow by removing counterproductive individuals from a herd.  This hunt has also been approved by CITES, US Fish and Wildlife and International Union for Conservation of Nature.
  • 100 percent of the auction proceeds will support the Conservation Trust Fund for Namibia's Black Rhino.  The Dallas Safari Club predicts this item to bring in a minimum of $250,000.  Last year’s event to help the lions (which, yes, included a lion hunt auction item) raised millions.
Picture
Picture
The issue is most people, primarily brought on by the tree-hugger variety of environmentalist, think of hunting as poaching.  But, while, yes, all poachers (by definition) are hunters, all hunters are NOT poachers.  In fact, responsible hunters are proving themselves to be more of a solution to the problem rather than being the problem itself.  Hunters are actually more interested in true conservation because if they overhunt they will no longer be able to hunt, so they actually have a higher personal investment in the success of a species than animal lover onlookers who have never seen an animal in the wild.

Think of it this way, hunting organizations, such as the Dallas Safari Club, contribute $300 million annually to conservation.  In addition to that, $4.2 billion has been contributed to conservation since 1937 through a 10% federal excise taxes on firearms, ammunition, and gear.  As I have said time and time again, the world is run by those who have the money.  And who has money?  Rich, hunting enthusiasts.  Who doesn’t?  Me (a budding conservationist).  So, bid away, hunters.  The more you bid on this item the better.  And to whoever wins, I hope it’s the experience of a lifetime.

2 Comments

Fe-eding the Ocean

7/15/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
This satellite image shows a large phytoplankton bloom, about 150 miles in diameter, that occurred in the Northwest Pacific Ocean off the coast of Hokkaido, Japan in May 2009. Credit: Photo by Norman Kuring, MODIS Ocean Color Team/NASA
The political hot topic of climate change has brought about an idea which has been kicking around the oceanography community for a while: supplementing the oceans with iron (Fe) to improve the health of the ocean by promoting the growth of carbon-dioxide consuming organisms.  This idea was based off a theory that a short lived biological productivity boom after the last ice age (≈14,000 years ago) was caused by  run off from an emerging continental shelf which they assume was rich in iron because iron has been known to cause blooms in today’s oceans.  This theory, however, was recently debunked by a team of scientists from the US, UK and Norway who discovered through the analysis of sediment cores that the level of iron actually decreases during deglatiation (i.e. the melting of the ice which would have been the source of that run off).  Past sediment core studies had looked at the mineral content confirming the productivity boom (increased opal and calcium from shells) but had never looked specifically at iron.  Pheobe Lam of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) and co-author of the study said:
"We saw the flux of iron was really high during glacial times, and that it dropped during deglaciation.  We didn't see any evidence of a pulse of iron right before this productivity peak."
They’re re-hypothesis suggests what they are calling a “transient perfect storm of nutrients and light” which produced ideal conditions for optimal growth which could be sustained for only a few hundred years.  They believe that the changing climate produced mixing in the Northern Pacific which pushed nutrients from the deep oceans up and pushed photosynthesizing surface organisms, such as plankton, down.  Then, the freshwater from melting ice stopped the mixing leaving the organisms in a thin, bright, nutrient-rich top layer of ocean allowing the organisms to flourish for a few hundred years until their life producing nutrients ran out.

Some scientists were already skeptical about adding iron to the oceans due to the unknown impact the process could have on the ocean and the thought that it may only decrease carbon-dioxide levels temporarily.  In 2007, another chemist at WHOI said, “While there is still no agreement on the efficiency of [carbon-dioxide] reduction or its environmental impacts, some scientists are willing to consider further experiments to address these remaining uncertainties, given that future policies and carbon-offset markets may emerge with or without a sound scientific basis,” and this recent study did just that.

Now I am going to stand on my soap box.  I think we as humans have a responsibility to interfere when we are deliberately hurting the environment but it can be prevented (such as poaching, overfishing, deforestation, etc.); however, sometimes I think we need to just let nature do its thing.  The earth has an ebb and flow of heating and cooling, productivity and sterility, a series of highs and lows trying to create a balance.  For some reason humans think we can affect the balance for our benefit but what says by pumping the oceans full of iron to reduce something bad we don’t actually end up producing something worse when nature tries to compensate for our actions.  Humans don’t think in an earthly timescale, they think in a humanly timescale.  The productivity boom after the ice age was produced over hundreds of years.  I’m sure the people who want to pump the oceans with iron aren’t thinking of that kind of a timeline.  They are thinking they will see results they’ll see immediately, which there may be A result immediately but THE result may not be for another hundred or thousand years.  The statement by the WHOI chemist saying “future policies and carbon-offset markets may emerge with or without a sound scientific basis” is a perfect example of how politics are manipulating people who want to do good for the planet into doing things that may not be.  If only we could just keep politics out of it.

The planet has gone through phases like this before.  Humans are going to produce carbon-dioxide.  The only way to really prevent the carbon-dioxide levels we make is to stop industry and that ain’t gunna happen.  Yes, there are probably things we can do to keep it from accelerating, yes, we should take better care of our planet, yes, it is better to be “green”, but don’t do it because you want to see climate change stop because it’s not going to (the Quaternary glaciation has seen 8 glacial cycles and we are still technically in it!).  Do it because you don’t want to be destructive and you want to aide in the recovery, not add to the strain.


  • Phoebe J. Lam, Laura F. Robinson, Jerzy Blusztajn, Camille Li, Mea S. Cook, Jerry F. McManus, Lloyd D. Keigwin.Transient stratification as the cause of the North Pacific productivity spike during deglaciation. Nature Geoscience, 2013
Picture
Glacial and interglacial cycles of the late Pleistocene epoch represented by atmospheric carbon-dioxide measured from ice core samples going back 650,000 years
0 Comments

The Last Lions

4/27/2013

0 Comments

 
Picture
So excited I've finally added this to my DVD library!
Look what got delivered today!  If you haven't seen (or heard of) The Last Lions, come on over and we'll watch it.  This is one of the best documentaries, wildlife or non, I have ever seen.  It has the film quality of Planet Earth but follows a story rather simply documenting behavior.  It's a real life Lion King - and it doesn't hurt that it's narrated by Scar (Jeremy Irons).

Most people are exposed to "true" wildlife through channels such as Animal Planet.  But, in our reality show driven society, the programming on these stations is no longer focused on education but rather, entertainment.  You are not going to learn anything of value about wildlife from Finding Bigfoot or Hillbilly Hand Fishing.  (I don't even watch Animal Planet anymore their programming is so worthless).  Disney Nature has done a pretty good job trying to get people interested in nature not "nature" having come out with a few wildlife films, which are wonderful but definitely geared towards a certain demographic.  African Cats, which followed the lives of a family of lions and a family of cheetahs was absolutely adorable, however, it is for a rated G audience and life in the wild is not rated G.

I had the opportunity to go to the premiere of The Last Lions at the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego on February 9, 2011.  The premier included a Q&A with the filmmakers Dereck & Beverly Joubert.  What makes this film unlike any other wildlife program is that this husband and wife team took the time for the lions to habituate to their presence allowing for a virtually, truly wild portrayal of a lion's life.  They lived amongst these lions for years basically becoming one with the bush so we can have a glimpse into the lion's world.  They also made a point not to anthropomorphize while writing the script.  In other words, they didn't give the lions human emotions, leaving the interpretation up to the viewer.  There is no holding back in this movie.  It is very real and you will feel all the emotions that go along with that.  

0 Comments

Pleistocene Park

4/5/2013

1 Comment

 
In honor of Jurassic Park opening in 3D today, I thought I would share with everyone the new developments in science which could make this science fiction, science fact.  While it will be a LONG time (if ever) until we will be able to clone a T-rex, it is a very real possibility that we will be able to clone more recently extinct animals to create an “insert time period here” park.

Picture
Natural decay rates make it impossible to retrieve the whole genome of animals that went extinct tens of millions of years ago but animals that have gone extinct within the past 50,000 years or less could contain enough viable DNA to piece together a fully sequenced genome.  The ability to bring back extinct animals is so within reach there was a TEDx conference held in Washington D.C. on March 15th of this year where they discussed the ethics of “De-Extinction.”

Picture
BBC Nature
After the successful, yet very short lived, cloning of an extinct Ibex in 2003, scientists have been improving and perfecting the process.  Now, cloning the megafauna which went extinct during the last ice age is no longer just conjecture.  After finding well-preserved mammoths in the Siberian tundra, scientists at the Sooam Biotech Research Foundation in Seoul teamed up with mammoth experts from a university in Siberia to find mammoth tissue buried in the cliffs of the Permafrost.  From the bone marrow, hair, skin and fat they found, the scientists are looking for a live cell they can reprogram to grow into an embryo cell then clone.  If they can’t find a live, viable cell, their next plan of action is going to be to transfer a mammoth nucleus into an emptied elephant egg cell.  But, even if they found a viable cell today, we are still a number of years away from a mammoth being born.  After implantation into an elephant surrogate, it would still be 2+ years before any offspring would grace us with its presence (elephant gestation is 645 days). 

These remarkable developments in genetic research mean the ridiculous (albeit innovative) proposal of Pleistocene Rewilding could come to fruition in a way they never thought possible when they proposed the idea in 2006.  Pleistocene Rewilding was thought up by a group of conservationists lead by Dr. Josh Donlan, direct of Advanced Conservation Strategies at Cornell.  They suggested that by bringing Pleistocene equivalent species to the historical home ranges of their counterparts we can increase biodiversity, kickstart evolutionary interactions that have gone dormant since the loss of megafauana, and create a multi-continental system for conservation of currently endangered species.  Basically, their idea is to bring Africa & Asia to the Great Plains of the United States to increase ecosystem interactions.  One of the stages of their plan is the creation of a Pleistocene Park.  Their intention was to have proxy species (i.e. Asian Elephants for Woolly Mammoths) act as ecological stand-ins for extinct species but with these new technological advances, why not have a park with the real thing.

Picture
Life finds a way.
Picture
Spanning from 2.5 million - 10,000 years ago, the Pleistocene Epoch was characterized by great biodiversity across the world.

I know what you’re thinking, but, Caitlin, Jurassic Park didn’t turn out so well.  True, but there are some major differences between Pleistocene megafauna and Jurassic dinosaurs.  Yes, we have ZERO knowledge of either of their actual behavior, but, I have a sneaking suspicion Pleistocene megafauna husbandry wouldn't be too much different than that of Holocene megafauna (that’s right now).  There obviously will have to be species specific changes made (which we wouldn't find out about until after they're cloned) but zoos all over the world make alterations to their husbandry protocols and enclosures all the time when they receive a new species or have to make placement changes to their exhibits.  Plus, Michael Crichton (may he rest in peace) has already thought up of all the things that could go wrong:   don’t use frog DNA to fill gaps, make sure you have strong fencing, be prepared for natural disasters you know occur in the area, have thorough background checks of employees and so one and so forth....

But, even though the ten year old inside of me thinks this is the COOLEST idea ever, however amazing it would be to see a real, live mammoth, saber-toothed cat or Jefferson’s sloth, what’s the real purpose other than pure entertainment value?  There was a reason these species went extinct 10,000 years ago and, while humans may have been a factor and some people may feel “responsible”, we have to remember, it’s been 10,000 years.   The ecosystem has had a chance to adapt, change and evolve.  Adding those megafauna back into the mix could end up causing more problems than solving.  The list of objections and potential conflicts far outweighs the perceived benefits, and this is without adding de-extinction into the equation.  But, just because I don’t think a mammoth should be brought back to life, doesn’t mean this research is for not.  While I believe it is more important for us as intellectual beings to focus our efforts on pre-extinction than de-extinction, I CAN see the benefits of being able to bring back a species which has recently been wiped off the earth because of human thoughtlessness.  Would this research make it possible to see a western black rhino, which was declared extinct only a year and a half ago, on the plains of Africa again? It will be interesting to see where this research takes us in the next decade whether its to a Pleistocene Park or a new population of rhinos in Africa.

Picture
National Geographic

or

Picture
One Green Planet
1 Comment

Dino Farts

5/8/2012

1 Comment

 
Picture
Illustration from Mark Hallett Paleoart/Photo Researchers (NationalGeographic.com)
Somewhere out there a scientist is measuring lizard emissions and, while it may seem like a complete waste of resources to some people, the findings make for an interesting comparison for current and past environmental conditions and the politics and culture that surround it.

National Geographic recently released an article entitled "Dinosaurs' Gaseous Emissions Warmed Earth?" (Published May 7 by Charles Choi on NationalGeographic.com) in which it describes and critiques the findings of a study done by Dr. Dave Wilkinson of Liverpool John Moores University.  The jist of the article is if modern day lizards and mammals give off 50-100 million metric tons of methane gas annually then 20-ton dinosaurs probably gave off somewhere close to the total amount of current natural as well as man-made daily emissions, which is around 520 million metric tons annually.  And, while the comments left by readers of the article indicate a bit of debate and skepticism, I believe the results are simply a reflection on how much we know and don't know about the earth and its geological and environmental history.

Really, this is just more proof that warming and cooling are all a part of the natural cycle of things.  "...fossil findings make it clear that sauropods lived in a much warmer world than we do.  People sometimes describe it as a super-greenhouse."  Haha, yeah, a super-greenhouse of dino farts! 

1 Comment

    Caitlin Curry

    I am a biologist and my life is crap!

    Subscribe!

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

    Or Click Here!

     Subscribe in a reader

    Tweets by @ThatLionLady

    Archives

    September 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    March 2018
    November 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012

    Categories

    All
    12 Days
    Africa
    Animal Print
    Arizona
    Aso
    Autoimmune
    Ben Winchell
    Bill Nye
    Biodiversity
    Birthday
    Bison
    Breeding
    California
    Carnivores
    Ccf
    Cgpgrey
    Cheetah
    Cites
    Clean
    Coffee
    Conservation
    Cres
    Crowdfunding
    CVM
    Dance
    Darwin
    Decorating
    Demo
    Dinosaurs
    Dogs
    Dreams
    Earth
    Echocardiogram
    Eclipse
    Elephant
    Emissions
    Evolution
    Family
    Flash Mob
    Food
    Football
    Genetics
    Global Biodiversity Information Facility
    Gluten Free
    Gluten-free
    Gluten Intolerance
    Goals
    Graduate School
    Halloween
    Health
    Henry Doorly Zoo
    Hgtv
    Holidays
    Institute For Conservation Research
    Invisible Children
    Iucn
    Kony 2012
    Lab
    Leap Year
    Leopard
    Life
    Lion
    Lions
    Lmfao
    Lra
    Mapping
    Marvel
    Megaherbivores
    Methane
    Michael Kors
    Moon
    Moving
    Nasa
    National Geographic
    National Science Foundation
    Nerds
    New Mexico
    News
    Offer
    OHDZA
    Pandas
    Photography
    PLoS ONE
    Pods
    Politics
    Psychology
    Publication
    Rainforest
    Rheumatic Fever
    Rheumatologist
    Rhinoceros
    Road Trip
    Route 66
    San Diego Safari Park
    San Diego Zoo
    San Diego Zoo Global
    Science
    Seed Dispersal
    S'mores
    SSP
    Tbtt
    Texas
    Texas A&M
    Transit Of Venus
    University Of Colorado Boulder
    Usfws
    Washington Post
    Wedding
    Welcome
    Wildlife
    Writing
    Yale
    Zambia

    RSS Feed

                                  Blog      About      Contact      News
© Caitlin Curry All Rights Reserved